Parcel mapping is at the heart of land management, appraisal, and development, but what does it mean when we say our parcels are "accurate"? After a lively discussion at a recent surveying conference, I realized that many professionals, especially in surveying and GIS, often conflate precision with accuracy. This blog post is meant to unpack the true meaning of parcel accuracy, explain why precision doesn't always mean accuracy, and offer practical ways to evaluate the reliability of your parcel data.

Accuracy vs. Precision: What's the Difference?

At its core, accuracy refers to how close a measurement is to the true value. Precision, on the other hand, describes how consistently you can replicate a measurement.

Imagine a target:

High Precision, Low Accuracy: Measurements are tightly grouped but far from the bullseye.
Low Precision, High Accuracy: Measurements are scattered but centered around the bullseye.
Low Precision, Low Accuracy: Random measurements with no consistency or centrality.
High Precision, High Accuracy: Measurements are tightly clustered around the bullseye.

When someone claims, "My CAD-generated parcels are more accurate because the traverse closes," they are talking about precision, not accuracy. The closure ratio (like 1:20,000 or 1:100,000) measures how consistently measurements return to the starting point—it does not measure how close they are to the real-world positions or dimensions.

In GIS and surveying, understanding this distinction is crucial to building reliable datasets.

The Five Pillars of Parcel Accuracy

True parcel accuracy isn't a single concept; it’s a framework based on five pillars:

Geometric Accuracy
Geographic Accuracy
Topological Accuracy
Attribute Accuracy
Temporal Accuracy

Let’s dive into each one.

1. Geometric Accuracy: Shape and Dimensions

Geometric accuracy is how well a parcel’s mapped shape reflects its real-world dimensions. When importing bearing and distance data into GIS, rounding errors (e.g., rounding to the nearest hundredth of a foot or the nearest second of arc) can accumulate, leading to discrepancies between the mapped geometry and the actual ground conditions.

A common mistake is approximating curves with straight line segments. For instance, a property boundary that is supposed to follow a smooth arc might be mapped as a series of jagged, straight lines. Even before measuring distances, one can visually detect poor geometric accuracy if curves are misrepresented.

Tools like ArcGIS Pro's traverse editor allow surveyors and GIS professionals to input exact bearings and distances. However, if these inputs are rounded, the resulting parcels will never perfectly match the reality of the ground.

2. Geographic Accuracy: Real-World Placement

Geographic accuracy deals with the location of a parcel on the Earth’s surface. A CAD file might precisely describe a lot’s shape, but it isn't significant if it's floating at arbitrary coordinates (like 10,000,10,000) without a projection.

Spatial referencing becomes vital when moving from CAD to GIS. Accurate parcels must be aligned with real-world coordinate systems and projections accounting for Earth’s curvature. Errors in geographic accuracy can compound issues when layering different datasets, from roads to zoning to environmental features.

Techniques like georeferencing historical plats or overlaying parcels onto high-resolution satellite imagery can help validate geographic placement.

3. Topological Accuracy: Relationships and Connectivity

Topological accuracy examines how parcels relate to each other:

Are adjacent parcels truly contiguous?
Are there overlaps or gaps?
Do subdivisions properly contain their associated lots?

Modern GIS systems, particularly Esri’s Parcel Fabric, include topology rules and error detection tools to ensure valid spatial relationships. Overlaps, gaps, and misalignments can cause significant headaches, especially when parcel data is used for taxation, development planning, or emergency services.

Remember, a single error in topology can ripple through entire datasets, affecting analyses and decision-making.

4. Attribute Accuracy: Information Completeness

A parcel isn’t just a shape—it’s also a collection of attributes (like owner name, parcel ID, acreage, and legal description).

Attribute accuracy evaluates whether:

All fields are correctly filled.
The recorded measurements match the calculated dimensions.
Discrepancies between the record and calculated data are adequately documented.

For example, a survey might show a record distance of 115.00 feet between two points, but actual measurement yields 115.16 feet. This is not an error—it's a refinement! However, users could be misled by the absence of careful recording and measuring distances.

Best practices recommend storing multiple values: record distance, calculated distance, and observed measurement, where possible. Including COGO (Coordinate Geometry) types and metadata fields (like data sources or measurement methods) greatly enhances trust in your parcel data.

5. Temporal Accuracy: Staying Current

Finally, temporal accuracy asks: How up-to-date is your parcel data?

Even the best-mapped parcels lose value if they're not current. Property boundaries change daily through subdivisions, consolidations, and sales. A dataset updated only once a year could be woefully outdated for industries like real estate, insurance, or disaster response.

Modern GIS systems track created and modified dates internally, but exposing these timestamps to data users is crucial. Some organizations even maintain a public "last updated" field to show when each parcel was reviewed or edited.

In today's fast-paced world, speed is the new accuracy. If data isn't fresh, it isn't trustworthy.

Why "Accurate Parcels" is a Dangerous Claim

After decades of working in surveying and GIS, I can confidently say that no one has perfectly accurate parcels.

Geometry will have rounding errors.
Geography will include projection distortions.
Topology will inevitably have gaps or overlaps.
Attributes may be incomplete or inconsistent.
Temporal snapshots will always be slightly out of date.

Instead of claiming perfect accuracy, a better goal is transparency. Document your known tolerances, acknowledge where your data can improve, and actively maintain your parcel datasets.

Parcel mapping is an evolving discipline that blends measurement, modeling, and approximation. By striving to improve all five accuracy pillars, we can build more trustworthy systems that better serve governments, businesses, and citizens.

Conclusion: Always Be Improving

Next time someone asks if your parcels are accurate, think beyond closure ratios and smooth lines. Think holistically:

Does the geometry reflect reality?
Are locations geographically aligned?
Do you know if the relationships between parcels are correct?
Do you know if the descriptive information is thorough?
Is the data current?

Understanding and improving the five pillars of parcel accuracy will set you apart as a GIS professional and ensure your datasets support critical decisions with confidence.

If you'd like to learn more about how Panda Consulting can help you optimize your parcel data, you can visit our website or reach out directly. As the nation's first ESRI Parcel Management Specialty partner, we’re always happy to share insights and best practices!

Blog

How Accurate Are Your Parcels? Rethinking Parcel Mapping and Accuracy in GIS